An Evolutionary Theist

Francis Collins at the Veritas Forum

As you can see--the video is quite long, but for those interested in the subject worthwhile.  I have read his arguments against creationism but NOT against theism and agree with him on both points--it is possible to at once ascribe to evolution as a reasonable theoretical construct encompassing life on Earth as it is presently and a theological worldview.  It is not possible to maintain these stands when allied with any form of literalism--evolutionary or biblical.  Literalism in the evolutionary sense gives rise to Spencerian nonsense and some of the worst strains of Kipling's "White Man's Burden" ideology. 

Comments

  1. FredFebruary 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM

    I was raised a Catholic and went to a Catholic grammar school and high school in Chicago. I got my first formal exposure to evolution in the biology class in the Catholic high school, taught by an Augustinian priest.

    His point was that there was nothing in the Bible or in Catholic theology that was opposed to evolution. And, he accepted the physical evolution of humankind--however, God still intervened and installed the human soul, the spiritual aspect of humans.

    ReplyDelete
  2. StevenFebruary 9, 2010 at 2:46 PM

    Dear Fred,

    A position with which I have no trouble whatsoever concurring, and which several of the wiser members of the Church hierarchy have affirmed.

    shalom,

    Steven

    ReplyDelete
  3. JonathanFebruary 24, 2010 at 12:21 AM

    No you are wrong. The Bible says the world was created in seven days and God wrote it and everything in it is true, and non metaphorical. The earth is the center of the universe, Jesus was a plant, rocks can sing and snakes talk, and the most abominable thing is a homosexual.

    ReplyDelete
  4. StevenFebruary 24, 2010 at 7:07 AM

    Dear Jonathan,

    And yea, these two things does the Lord hate, these three does He abominate--what a terrible mathematician He must be if all is literal. And I know that when Jesus says that He is a door, I am to start looking immediately for the doorknob and hinges, and when He says He is a path, I am to look for pebbles and such.

    Thank you. I appreciate the comment and agree with its spirit if I am reading you correctly. And, having stopped by your abbreviated blog (It's a shame there is not more of it) I do believe that I am.

    Thank you,

    shalom,

    Steven

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Angel Time--Anne Rice

Review copy received 11/04/09 From the time of its announcement, I had been looking forward to this new book by Anne Rice.  As I say in every review, I am not a die-hard Anne Rice fan.  I found Interview with a Vampire interesting and intriguing, but in hindsight, must lay much of the responsibility of the current vampire as victim and love-object obsession at its feet.  After that, I had no patience with her writing until Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt. In that book I observed a kind of control and authorial voice that I had not seen in any of the books I had sampled since Interview .  So too with Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana. Perhaps because of the subject matter, perhaps for other reasons, these two books seemed to witness a level of control of language and story that the other books did not.  Gone were messy florid passages that lavished two, three, four paragraphs on the description of the lace and flounce of a jabot.  These new books were spare, polished, poetic. The
Read more

Another Queen of Night

I post this because whenever I recommend to anyone the Queen of Night, I always recommend it in the Lucia Popp rendition.  It's a matter of personal taste, but what I love about this is that it is somewhat slower than the other versions and as a result, it would seem to me somewhat more difficult to perform and sustain--those high notes in which the Queen's voice becomes the Magic Flute itself are rounded, full, and deep while remaining light and airy. I have read some rather severe criticism of this ritardando; and while it may or may not reflect Mozart's intent, it is certainly within the options for staging.  It creates a real vocal showpiece from what is already a magnificent example of same. It really is an amazing example of a virtuoso composition sung by a virtuoso voice.  All of which should not be taken to mean that I do not truly appreciate the version posted earlier by Diana Damrau, it's just nice to see what a difference tempo can make. I think we can take
Read more