What Was New, Was New

. . . but it wasn't necessarily very good.  Another view of Gibson's Neuromancer, which by the tone of my introduction, you can tell I disagree with.

However, all that really says, is that in all fairness I need to revisit the book and see if my initial impression hold.  They certainly didn't for A Handmaid's Tale, so after a few items are swept off the table, it may be time to revisit Mr. Gibson's opus.  Given the enthusiasm it sparks, I must have missed something.  I may miss it again--that doesn't mean the book isn't worth reading.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lewis Carroll and James Joyce

Another Queen of Night