How we feel Is an illusion we choose
Popular posts from this blog
Angel Time--Anne Rice
Review copy received 11/04/09 From the time of its announcement, I had been looking forward to this new book by Anne Rice. As I say in every review, I am not a die-hard Anne Rice fan. I found Interview with a Vampire interesting and intriguing, but in hindsight, must lay much of the responsibility of the current vampire as victim and love-object obsession at its feet. After that, I had no patience with her writing until Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt. In that book I observed a kind of control and authorial voice that I had not seen in any of the books I had sampled since Interview . So too with Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana. Perhaps because of the subject matter, perhaps for other reasons, these two books seemed to witness a level of control of language and story that the other books did not. Gone were messy florid passages that lavished two, three, four paragraphs on the description of the lace and flounce of a jabot. These new books were sp...
Another Queen of Night
I post this because whenever I recommend to anyone the Queen of Night, I always recommend it in the Lucia Popp rendition. It's a matter of personal taste, but what I love about this is that it is somewhat slower than the other versions and as a result, it would seem to me somewhat more difficult to perform and sustain--those high notes in which the Queen's voice becomes the Magic Flute itself are rounded, full, and deep while remaining light and airy. I have read some rather severe criticism of this ritardando; and while it may or may not reflect Mozart's intent, it is certainly within the options for staging. It creates a real vocal showpiece from what is already a magnificent example of same. It really is an amazing example of a virtuoso composition sung by a virtuoso voice. All of which should not be taken to mean that I do not truly appreciate the version posted earlier by Diana Damrau, it's just nice to see what a difference tempo can make. I think we can take...
"To the poet worth reading, the last thing that matters is being read. And so, in many ways, the trick to growing poets is a lot like growing truffles; best to feed them sh-t and keep them in the dark."
ReplyDeleteSteven,
What is your reaction to the above quotation taken from the article?
It's clever, but--is being read the last thing poets care about?
Dear Fred,
ReplyDeleteI would say exactly the opposite was true. To the poet worth reading, what he cares most about is being read, NOT necessarily being understood or appreciated for his evocative use of syntax.
If you don't write to be read you have no audience other than yourself and so you need only to please yourself.
I do think there is a sense in which it is accurate and that is in the throes of composition and even revision, your eye is not on being read, but on saying as exactly as possible what you mean to say. So there may be a sense in which the poet is not considering the audience but is looking deeply into what is resounding within.
But I know that the thing I want most as a poet is to have people read what I write and enjoy it. Yes, enjoy--not appreciate, analyze, or send through some sort of critical cuisinart (although if that is a means of enjoyment--then have at it).
Long response, and ambivalent, but I get your point. Thanks for writing.
shalom,
Steven
Steven,
ReplyDeleteI agree. I'm no poet, but I do have my blog, and the main reason for it is to express some of my ideas for others to read and possibly comment upon. Whitman's poem that I placed on the home page probably best expresses my reasons for the blog.
And it is true that while I'm working on a post, I'm thinking more about the writing than the audience, but when I revise, the audience is always in mind.
First I work on expressing what I'm thinking, but then other questions come up:
Is this understandable?
Does this make sense?
These are my concerns then.