I post this because whenever I recommend to anyone the Queen of Night, I always recommend it in the Lucia Popp rendition. It's a matter of personal taste, but what I love about this is that it is somewhat slower than the other versions and as a result, it would seem to me somewhat more difficult to perform and sustain--those high notes in which the Queen's voice becomes the Magic Flute itself are rounded, full, and deep while remaining light and airy. I have read some rather severe criticism of this ritardando; and while it may or may not reflect Mozart's intent, it is certainly within the options for staging. It creates a real vocal showpiece from what is already a magnificent example of same. It really is an amazing example of a virtuoso composition sung by a virtuoso voice. All of which should not be taken to mean that I do not truly appreciate the version posted earlier by Diana Damrau, it's just nice to see what a difference tempo can make. I think we can take
Thanks, Steven!
ReplyDeleteDear Randy,
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, as always. Your words gave me, well, hope is not the right word, but perhaps "right-thought." They were a salutary reminder that if one wants to pay the price, if one really wants to do something, it often lies within one's means to make the choice to do it. Not always, and not without a certain amount of support and assistance--sometimes natural, sometimes supernatural.
Thank you.
shalom,
Steven
What a gem Randy's blog is! Thanks for introducing me to it, Steven!
ReplyDeleteDear Connie,
ReplyDeleteIt really is my pleasure. Everyone could benefit from reading Randy's blog--while it does have a "business" focus, the information there is of use to whomever requires a bit of organization in his or her life.
shalom,
Steven