tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142267147565207978.post1790503880185802097..comments2023-11-05T07:37:53.634-05:00Comments on A Momentary Taste of Being: Deeply Mysterious and Worthy of ReflectionStevenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15520240994034904255noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142267147565207978.post-81074367261809788702011-04-18T07:18:53.681-04:002011-04-18T07:18:53.681-04:00Dear Kevin,
A lovely interpretation. I'm not...Dear Kevin,<br /><br />A lovely interpretation. I'm not certain how it fits in with the whole corpus--but this is certainly one way of viewing it, and a deeply mysterious way at that. Mystical, perhaps.<br /><br />Thank you.<br /><br />shalom,<br /><br />StevenStevenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15520240994034904255noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4142267147565207978.post-76852847903287322142011-04-16T15:51:58.681-04:002011-04-16T15:51:58.681-04:00Hmm, lovely. It's almost a reversal of Christi...Hmm, lovely. It's almost a reversal of Christian thinking, isn't it? God isn't first. He's not figurehead from which all proceeds. Instead, there are two heirs. Sons who inherits life from fathers, as well as life's attendant blessings and curses, and God, who appears to be identified by Rilke as perpetual youthful blooming, who inherits its attendant glories of father, son, and life ever-changing. Life first, God second. Maybe. KAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com